Legal Opinion

Pindak v. Dart

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 27, 2015No. 10 C 6237PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, United States District Judge

This case "is a First Amendment challenge to restrictions imposed by private security officers and Cook County Deputy Sheriffs on panhandling activities in Daley Plaza. Plaintiffs Kim Pindak, Norman Talley, and Sam Phillips are three individuals who regularly panhandle to supplement their income and who have attempted to panhandle on Daley Plaza. ■ Plaintiffs allege that Cook County Deputy Sheriffs and private security guards employed by Securitas Services, Inc. have repeatedly interfered with Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Almond v. Wexford Health Source, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  2. Bocock v. DartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  3. Hampton v. CagleDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2024
  4. Rankin v. ObaisiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Reed v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API