Legal Opinion

Huff v. Jolly

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Norton District Court. Action to recover money and to enforce a mechanics’ lien. The opinion states the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

This was an action by Huff & Myers, a firm of contractors, to recover $840.25 from F. M. Jolly & Co., for material and labor furnished in the erection of a building on lots 9 and 10, of block 7, in the town of Almena, against which they seek to enforce a lien. Several parties who claimed an interest in the premises, among whom were Annie Jolly and Charles N. Van Cleave, were made parties defendant. The court awarded plaintiffs a judgment against F. M. Jolly & Co. for $735, and decreed that $136.10 of that sum was a lien on lot 10, but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago Lumber Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chicago Lumber Co. v. FretzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. Eccles Lumber Co. v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Chicago Lumber Co. v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Norris v. NitschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API