Huff v. Jolly
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Norton District Court. Action to recover money and to enforce a mechanics’ lien. The opinion states the material facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This was an action by Huff & Myers, a firm of contractors, to recover $840.25 from F. M. Jolly & Co., for material and labor furnished in the erection of a building on lots 9 and 10, of block 7, in the town of Almena, against which they seek to enforce a lien. Several parties who claimed an interest in the premises, among whom were Annie Jolly and Charles N. Van Cleave, were made parties defendant. The court awarded plaintiffs a judgment against F. M. Jolly & Co. for $735, and decreed that $136.10 of that sum was a lien on lot 10, but…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. FretzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
- Eccles Lumber Co. v. MartinUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Norris v. NitschSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Cahill-Swift Mfg. Co. v. SayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.