Legal Opinion
United States v. Consigli Construction Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 5, 2012No. 2:12-cv-023-NTPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY AND COMPEL ARBITRATION
NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.
Defendants Consigli Construction Co. (“Consigli”) and Federal Insurance Company (“FIC”) move to stay the suit of Plaintiff Maverick Construction Management Services, Inc. (“Maverick”) for payment under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 3131-3134,1 and to compel arbitration *411pursuant to the parties’ contract. For the reasons that follow, the Defendants’ motion to stay and compel arbitration is GRANTED.
I. Factual Background
Maverick alleges that in September of 2010 it entered into a subcontract with general…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2017
- Kourembanas v. Intercoast Colls.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Hall-Cloutier v. Sig Sauer, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- LOBSTER 207 LLC v. PETTEGROWDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020