Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters v. TNA NA Manufacturing
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 29, 2022No. A175864PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
447 Argued and submitted October 12, affirmed December 29, 2022 CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON REPRESENTED BY XL CATLIN SYNDICATES 2003 AND 1209, Liberty Syndicate 4472, and Novae Syndicate 2007, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TNA NA MANUFACTURING, INC., dba FOODesign Machinery & Systems; and Food Design, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Defendants-Respondents. Clackamas County Circuit Court 18CV15868; A175864
523 P3d 447
Plaintiffs (Lloyd’s London), the insurer for SunOpta, Inc. (SunOpta), brought this lawsuit alleging that equipment SunOpta bought from Food Design, Inc. (FDI) was defective.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estey v. MacKenzie Engineering Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Simonsen v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Milne v. Milne Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Atlas Mutual Insurance v. Moore Dry Kiln Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Colvin v. FMC Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Certain Underwriters v. TNA NA ManufacturingOregon Supreme Court · 2024
- Certain Underwriters v. TNA NA ManufacturingOregon Supreme Court · 2024