Legal Opinion
Netland v. Hess & Clark, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 16, 2001No. CIV.99-1032 ADM/RLEPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 1, 2001, the undersigned United States District Judge heard Defendant Hess & Clark’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 31], Defendant seeks summary judgment on Plaintiff Kim Net-land’s claims for: (1) “strict liability”; (2) “failure to warn”; and (3) “negligence and breach of warranty.” Compl. ¶¶ 12, 15,18. Defendant argues that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FI-FRA”), 7 U.S.C. § 136 et seq., preempts all common law actions against manufacturers of EPA-registered pesticides that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kim Netland v. Hess & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Kim Netland v. Hess & ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002