Legal Opinion

Smith v. Desautels

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 7, 2008No. 2006-146Published

1Opinion of the Court

953 A.2d 620 (2008)

2008 VT 17

Carl M. SMITH

v.

Emile DESAUTELS and Desautels House Movers, Inc.

No. 06-146.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

March 7, 2008.

Eugene Rakow of Eugene Rakow, P.C., and L. Maxwell Taylor and Alan Biederman of Biederman Law Office, Rutland, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Andrew Jackson, Middlebury, for Defendants-Appellees.

Present: DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ., and COOK, D.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.

DOOLEY, J.

¶ 1. Plaintiff, Carl Smith, was working for defendants, Desautels House Movers, Inc. and Emile Desautels, when an acetylene tank fell on his hand and crushed it.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. State v. OscarsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  4. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. Employers Mutual Companies v. SkillingIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API