Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Canafax

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1945No. 29705PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This action arose out of a collision between two automobiles within a street intersection. Plaintiff instituted suit to recover for damages to his car. Defendants cross-complained, seeking reimbursement for damages to their automobile and also for personal injuries sustained by one of the defendants. The cause was tried to the court without a jury. The court made findings, supporting its conclusions, and entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants appealed.

The accident here involved occurred within the intersection of Beacon avenue and Spokane street, in the city of Seattle, at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ruff v. Fruit Delivery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Neel v. HenneWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. W. L. Hulett Lbr. Co. v. Bartlett-Collins Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Kelly v. Kittitas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest v. HowellDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API