State v. Etienne
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Ricardo Etienne, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a court trial, of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139 (a) (3)1 and possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (c).2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to suppress. He also alleges evidential insufficiency and error.3 We affirm the judgment of the trial corut.
*547The court reasonably could have found the following facts. On the evening of April 29, 2003, officers from the Stamford police…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SeeleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Vincent Joseph COMPOS v. The PEOPLE of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- Com. v. Clark, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015