Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided August 16, 2010No. Cr. 06-00079 DAE-KSCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER: (1) DENYING AS MOOT IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO FORECLOSE PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING USING THE PCL-R AND OTHER UNRELIABLE TESTING INSTRUMENTS; (2) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING VIDEOTAPING OF EXAMINATIONS; (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DECISION ON PENDING TAINT TEAM QUESTION; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO SEAL

DAVID ALAN KARA, District Judge.

On August 9, 2010, the Court heard Defendant’s Motions. Marshall H. Silver-berg, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appeared at the hearing on behalf of the Government; John T. Philipsborn, Esq., and David…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API