Legal Opinion
Manning v. Barr
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-0664Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PETER MANNING et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-664 (TJK) MERRICK B. GARLAND et al.,1 Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Peter Manning and Aaron Barfield, proceeding pro se, sue various employees and entities of the federal government and the state of Washington, challenging Washington’s marijuana licensing and regulatory scheme. Before the Court are the federal Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, ECF No. 10, and the state Defendants’ motion to dismiss due…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.