Legal Opinion
United States v. Mittelsteadt
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 16, 1985No. 83-CR-12PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
On June 5, 1985, the defendant in this action filed a motion to correct inaccuracies in the presentence report (“PSR”) prepared by the United States Probation Office concerning the defendant. The defendant claims that the inaccuracies in the PSR have caused the United States Parole Commission to render an unduly high assessment of the severity of his offense, thereby eliminating his opportunity for release on parole. Since the Court has determined that it lacks jurisdiction over this matter, it will deny the defendant’s motion.
On April 21, 1983, the defendant was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael YamanisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. James Michael StephensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John Robert LeathCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Bobby E. Maynard v. Al HavenstriteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Thomas MittelsteadtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. SheelaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1987
- Dan Bagbey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986