Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 11, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCounihan, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for property damage arising out of a collision between an automobile truck owned by the plaintiff and operated by one Hamel, his employee, and a locomotive of the defendant on a railroad crossing on Water Street, Northampton. After denial of a motion for a directed verdict for the defendant, the action was submitted to a jury who returned a verdict for the plaintiff, which the judge received under leave reserved. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 120. Thereafter upon motion the judge entered a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff excepted.

There are three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Copithorn v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Eisenhauer v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Hunt v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borden v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Fay v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. O'BRIEN v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Big Chief Construction Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API