Alexander v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice.
Appellant Eunice Alexander appealed the trial court’s summary judgment holding that Appellee Lockheed Martin did not waive the right to contest compensability of Appellant’s worker’s compensation claim and that Appellant did not have a compen-sable claim. We hold that Appellee waived the right to contest compensability and that, as a result, Appellant had a compen-sable claim. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.
I. Facts and Procedural History
Appellant worked for Appellee, which was certified as a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Texas Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sara Care Child Care Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
- Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
- Lopez v. Zenith Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
- Charles Thompson v. Ace American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
- Donna Adams v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.