Ferris v. Curtis
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to El Paso District Court. — Hon. J. W. Si-iEaeor, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hill
This was an action to recover $1,809.55 with interest, claimed, to be the balance due upon a promissory note. The defendant plead the statute of limitations. The judgment was in his favor. The plaintiff brings the case here for review.
The facts are similar to those in Holmquist v. Gilbert, 41 Colo. 113, in that a deed of trust to a private trustee was given to secure the payment of this note, which was for $2,000 and interest, bearing date May 2nd, 1892, due five years after date. Thereafter, the defendant sold the property described in the deed of trust. This sale was subject to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. CareySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
- Holmquist v. GilbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Cross v. MoffatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Toothaker v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Sears v. HicklinColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bittle v. BrunettiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Van Diest v. TowleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Davidson v. HockingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Dodge v. EastSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Berry Dry Goods Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.