Legal Opinion

Smyser & McCormick v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1913No. 3244PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from. District Coivrt, Pawnee County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action -by Frank Hudson against Smyser & McCormick and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and front an order denying motion of defendants named for new trial they alone bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

This ease presents error from the district court of Pawnee county. November 1, 1910, the said court rendered a joint judgment against the Arkansas Yalley Town-site Company and H. C. Hanna, who were held liable upon .a certain promissory note. From an order of the court denying a motion for new trial of Smyser & McCormick, appeal has been lodged in this court.

The defendant in error now moves to dismiss the cause upon the ground of nonjoinder of proper parties. The record shows that the motion which was denied was filed on behalf ■of Smyser & McCormick, and time to make .and serve case was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bullen v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Seton v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garland v. American Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API