Legal Opinion
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Doll
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 27, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1330PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Kosan Biosciences Inc. filed this action on June 17, 2009 seeking review of certain patent term adjustments granted by the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Plaintiffs alleged that all of the challenged PTO patent term adjustment determinations relied on an erroneous interpretation of 35 U.S.C. § 154(b) rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Wyeth v. Kappos, 591 F.3d 1364 (Fed.Cir.2010). The Amended Complaint identified twenty-one…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Novartis Ag v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Chacoty v. TillersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. DollDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. KapposDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. v. KapposDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.