Legal Opinion

Millard v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement, of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

This action rests upon an agreed statement of facts, and is brought for the purpose of obtaining the judgment of this court as to the validity of certain bonds of the town of Greenburgh, in the. county *670of Westchester, advertised arid sold by the plaintiff, as supervisor of the town, to the defendants under the provisions of section 36 of the Drainage Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 15 ; Laws of 1909, chap. 20) in compliance with a peremptory writ of mandamus issued out of the Supreme Court, commanding the plaintiff to sell the bonds. The defendants have refused to accept delivery of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. County of ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Horton v. . AndrusNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. People ex rel. Linton v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. People ex rel. Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. MillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Pelt v. BertilrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API