Legal Opinion

State v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA C.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1987No. CV 87-00062-SAPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

I

Defendant, Michael J. Ahrens, was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Tucson of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The superior court of Pima County, Hon. Bernardo P. Velasco, granted defendant’s motion to reverse and the state brought a petition for special action to this court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. Art. 6, § 5(3) and Ariz.R.Sp.Act. 8, 17A A.R.S.

II

We consider only one question:

May the defendant’s refusal to take a blood alcohol test pursuant to the Arizona implied consent statute be used as evidence against him in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. SudduthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. State of Arizona v. Richard Allen ReedArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  3. SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State v. IrvingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. State v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API