Legal Opinion

Duane Joachim v. Oakland Housing Authority, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 3, 2026No. 4:26-cv-03158Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DUANE JOACHIM, Case No. 26-cv-03158-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE, DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR 9 v. ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS AND EX PARTE MOTION FOR TEMPORARY 10 OAKLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY, et RESTRAINING ORDER al., 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 16 Defendants. 12 13 14 On April 14, 2026, Plaintiff Duane Joachim, who proceeds in this action without the 15 assistance of an attorney, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a 16 complaint. Dkt. Nos. 1, 3. The Court granted the application to proceed in forma…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Karen Logan v. Us Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Kirk Erichsen v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API