Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Dodson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Writ or Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John D. Turnbaugh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

The Appellate Court for the First District affirmed a judgment for $8856.54 recovered in the municipal court of. Chicago by the defendant in error, Mary M. Arnold, against the plaintiff in error, William F. Dodson, and a writ of certiorari was granted to bring the record here for a review of the judgment of the Appellate Court.

The principal question is whether the municipal court had jurisdiction of the cause of action. The amount claimed exceeded $1000, and if the claim was in tort the court had no jurisdiction. If the claim stated by the plaintiff and proved at the trial was in assumpsit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Indiana, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. HendrianIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Long v. LinnIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Citizens' Gaslight & Heating Co. v. A. O. Granger & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stewart v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Howard v. SwiftIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  3. People Ex Rel. Swift v. Superior CourtIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Toombs v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Awotin v. Atlas Exchange National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API