Legal Opinion

Yee v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1990No. B14-89-641-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

Appellant, Christopher Ken Yee, was charged by indictment with the felony offense of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, namely, 3,4 methylen-edioxy amphetamine (MDA), weighing at least four hundred (400) grams by aggregate weight, including any adulterants and dilutants. The jury found him guilty and assessed punishment at a fine of $100,000 and seventy-five (75) years’ confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. Appellant raises three points of error. We reverse and remand.

*362At trial, shortly after both sides had rested and closed but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Rochester, New Hampshire, School District v. Timothy W. ex rel. Cynthia W.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Vital v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Holifield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zayas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  2. Sims v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Doyle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  4. Forbes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
  5. Lucious v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API