Legal Opinion

Vital v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1975No. 49891PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery by assault; punishment was assessed at 25 years.

Appellant was identified at trial as one of the men who committed the charged robbery at a Houston lounge. Defense witnesses testified that appellant was in Lake Charles, Louisiana, at the time of the offense. After deliberations during which the jury sent out notes requesting the reading of portions of the identification testimony and of the alibi testimony, a verdict of guilty was returned.

In his third ground of error appellant contends the trial court abused the discretion accorded it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Meeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Stanley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Steadham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Kepley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Peek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Montalvo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Lackey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Darrett Bernard Baker v. Honorable Don Metcalfe, Judge, Criminal District Court, Etc., RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API