Legal Opinion

Southwestern Arizona Fruit & Irrigation Co. v. Cameron

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1914No. Civil No. 1345PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. J. C. Phillips, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellee sued the appellant for a balance of $3,176.54, alleged to be due him on a written contract, by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed to repair and put into condition a designated portion of defendant’s canal, for which he was to receive $5,000. The complaint contains two counts; one count on the contract, which is pleaded in haec verba and according to its tenor and effect; and one on quantum meruit.

Defendant’s answer consisted of a general demurrer, an admission of the execution of the contract sued on, with a denial of its legal effect and tenor as pleaded by plaintiff, and a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. DeckerMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Adlard v. MuldoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Livingston v. WagnerNevada Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Spitalny v. Tanner Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sterling v. MarshallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API