Janes Contracting Co. v. Home Life & Accident Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
Prior to August 20, 1919, the plaintiffs in error were engaged in sewer construction in Ranger, Tex., and had outstanding and in force a policy of insurance theretofore issued to them under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, arts. 5246 — 1 to 5246 — 91) by defendant in error, which described plaintiffs in error’s business or occupation as “sewer building — maximum depth 7 feet at any one point,” and the premium rate thereon was $5.85 per $100 of employees’ pay roll, monthly basis, and the advance premium upon which was therefore $67.
The policy contained a list…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Redwine v. HudmanTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- Janes Contracting Co. v. Home Life & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Gise v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Wilson v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by9 opinions
- West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Borsari Tank Corporation Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Sheek v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Borsari Tank Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Borsari Tank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.