Legal Opinion

Janes Contracting Co. v. Home Life & Accident Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1924No. 507-3933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Prior to August 20, 1919, the plaintiffs in error were engaged in sewer construction in Ranger, Tex., and had outstanding and in force a policy of insurance theretofore issued to them under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, arts. 5246 — 1 to 5246 — 91) by defendant in error, which described plaintiffs in error’s business or occupation as “sewer building — maximum depth 7 feet at any one point,” and the premium rate thereon was $5.85 per $100 of employees’ pay roll, monthly basis, and the advance premium upon which was therefore $67.

The policy contained a list…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Redwine v. HudmanTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  3. Janes Contracting Co. v. Home Life & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Gise v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Wilson v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Borsari Tank Corporation Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. Sheek v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Borsari Tank Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Borsari Tank Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API