Legal Opinion

Hiner v. Richter

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. Chaeles Tueneb, Judge, presiding. The facts in this case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

This was an action upon the case, brought by Hiner, against Richter, for fraudulent representations made by the latter in regard to the number of acres contained in a piece of land sold by him to Hiner. The jury found for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict.

The first error assigned is, that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the second count of the declaration. The objection is taken to the éount, that it sets forth several distinct grounds for claiming special damages, some of which, it is insisted, are not valid grounds. But…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dietrich v. RumseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Matchett v. RoseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Guild v. MoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. N. C. Antle & Bro. v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Merwin v. ArbuckleIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. McAfee v. Rockford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API