Legal Opinion

Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 24, 1985No. 1 CA-IC 3165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

This is a special action review of an industrial commission award granting temporary medical and compensation benefits to the claimant, Armida Godfrey. The issue is whether an employee, who makes a *124deliberate material misrepresentation about his or her health to a prospective employer, is entitled to compensation benefits for an industrial injury that is causally related to the undisclosed condition. We find that such a misrepresentation precludes compensation arid we set aside the award.

In 1975, the claimant sustained an industrial injury to her back while working…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Martin Company v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. H. J. Jeffries Truck Line v. GrishamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marriott Corp. v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Rural Metro Corp. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API