Legal Opinion

Hamm v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 8, 2000No. 1990943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COOK, Justice.

Arthur Franklin Hamm was convicted of possession of a controlled substance. After considering a probation officer’s pre-sentence report, the trial court sentenced Hamm to five years in prison. Hamm petitioned for permission to appeal “infor-ma pauperis for purposes other than attorney fees.” The trial court denied the motion.

Hamm petitioned the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus, asking that court to direct the trial court to grant his indigency petition. The Court of Criminal Appeals, on February 11, 2000, denied Hamm’s mandamus petition and allowed him 14 days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Warren v. City of EnterpriseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Adams v. City of PelhamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API