Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Bleeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcNamee, J.

The plaintiff Dunn and the defendant Bleeck were partners engaged in the hotel business; and for the purpose of carrying on the partnership two corporations were formed, with an aggregate capital stock of 500 shares. Of these shares Bleeck *383owned 250, Dunn 248, and Dunn’s wife 2. Dunn became indebted to Bleeck, and a lawsuit resulted, to which Mrs. Dunn was made a party. On the trial it was stipulated that the court should treat the parties as partners, adjust all rights and liabilities, make provision for winding up their affairs; and that the pleadings be amended accordingly.

At that time one…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Leserman v. . BernheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Dunn v. BleeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Fromme v. GrayCity of New York Municipal Court · 1896
  5. Winterson v. HitchingsNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of FrameNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API