Legal Opinion

Rowell v. Jones & Vining, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 27, 1987PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The plaintiffs sued for vacation pay allegedly earned while employed by defendant, Jones & Vining, Inc. They now appeal from the summary judgment for the defendant entered by the Superior Court, An-droscoggin County. For the reasons hereinafter set forth, we affirm the judgment.

The parties stipulated, inter alia, to the following facts: The plaintiffs were full-time hourly nonunion employees who worked in the defendant’s shoe mold shop in Lewiston. On December 16, 1983, as a result of the substantial termination of its mold shop operation, Jones & Vining terminated the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Suastez v. Plastic Dress-Up Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Larrabee v. Penobscot Frozen Foods, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Public Finance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Karcz v. Luther Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Livestock Feeds, Inc. v. Local Union No. 1634 of Congress of Ind. WorkersMississippi Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McConkey v. Flathead Electric CooperativeMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Langager v. Crazy Creek Products, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. White v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  4. Gayer v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. Libby v. Calais Regional HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API