Legal Opinion
Lesnik v.Eisenmann SE
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 11, 2021No. 5:16-cv-01120Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Case No. 16-CV-01120-LHK GREGOR LESNIK; STJEPAN PAPES, 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO 14 v. COMPEL ENFORCEMENT OF SETTLEMENT 15 EISENMANN SE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Gregor Lesnik and Stjepan Papes (“Plaintiffs”) bring this motion to compel 19 enforcement of a settlement agreement and for sanctions against settling defendants Eisenmann 20 Corporation, Eisenmann SE, Eisenmann Anlagenbau Verwaltung GmbH,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- K.C. Ex Rel. Erica C. v. TorlaksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jeff D. v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Tnt Marketing, Inc., a Corporation, and Paul E. Simon, an Individual v. Frank AgrestiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Shine v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018