Legal Opinion
K.C. Ex Rel. Erica C. v. Torlakson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 11, 2014No. 12-16178PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:
The common-law doctrine of ancillary jurisdiction over related claims, codified as part of a federal court’s supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367, is generally well understood. Yet, as the Supreme Court observed, the “doctrine of ancillary jurisdiction can hardly be criticized for being overly rigid or precise,” because the more obscure doctrine of ancillary jurisdiction over collateral proceedings remains a matter of case law. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 379, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994); see 13 Charles Alan…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Baerbel McKinney-drobnis v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- San Diego County Credit Union v. CefcuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Donald Zimmerman v. City of Austin, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Shenecqua Butt v. United BrotherhoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Hill v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. (In re Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.