Legal Opinion
YOAST v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 21, 2022No. 2:19-cv-00720Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TERRENCE R. YOAST, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-720 v. POTTSTOWN BOROUGH, et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Rufe, J. March 21, 2022 Defendants Correctional Officer VanDorick, Correctional Officer Stein, and Montgomery County (together, the “County Defendants”) and Defendants Primecare Medical, Inc. (“Primecare”) and Anthony Hoch (together, the “Primecare Defendants”) have moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff Terrence Yoast’s remaining claims under 28 U.SC. § 1983 alleging violations of his rights under the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert Spruill v. Frank Gillis Goolier, C.O. McGlaughlin M.D. Brown, P.ACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Renee Palakovic v. John WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.