B. H. Newman, John Raiford and Kenneth Tapley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
Appellant Newman 1 and 16 other persons were indicted in Count One for conspiracy to violate federal liquor laws. 2 Appellant was also charged in seven subsequent counts with specific substantive offenses. He was convicted on the conspiracy charge and on four substantive counts, 3 and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. His appeal lists thirteen specifications of error which may be condensed into three general questions: Did the Court err in admitting evidence of appellant’s prior convictions for similar offenses? Was there sufficient evidence to support the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hargett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
3Cited by9 opinions
- B. H. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Robert William Bendelow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Mack Daniel and Ab Daniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Bobby Ray Reese and Johnny Cecil Tyler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Edward James Whalen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.