Legal Opinion

B. H. Newman, John Raiford and Kenneth Tapley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1955No. 15049_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

Appellant Newman 1 and 16 other persons were indicted in Count One for conspiracy to violate federal liquor laws. 2 Appellant was also charged in seven subsequent counts with specific substantive offenses. He was convicted on the conspiracy charge and on four substantive counts, 3 and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. His appeal lists thirteen specifications of error which may be condensed into three general questions: Did the Court err in admitting evidence of appellant’s prior convictions for similar offenses? Was there sufficient evidence to support the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hargett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  2. Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. B. H. Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Robert William Bendelow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Mack Daniel and Ab Daniel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Bobby Ray Reese and Johnny Cecil Tyler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. Edward James Whalen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API