Legal Opinion

Russell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1944No. 11014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

There was no error in permitting, by way of impeachment, cross-examination of the accused, who offered themselves as witnesses, touching previous convictions of crime; nor in the action of the court touching the argument of the district attorney.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hargett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  2. Edward James Whalen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. B. H. Newman, John Raiford and Kenneth Tapley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Morton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968