Legal Opinion
Russell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 18, 1944No. 11014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
There was no error in permitting, by way of impeachment, cross-examination of the accused, who offered themselves as witnesses, touching previous convictions of crime; nor in the action of the court touching the argument of the district attorney.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hargett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Edward James Whalen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- B. H. Newman, John Raiford and Kenneth Tapley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Morton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968