Herbin v. Farrish
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The trial court correctly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Since the bank account was in Ohio at the time of the death of the testatrix-depositor, the case is governed by the law of that state. Ellison v. Hunsinger, 237 N.C. 619, 75 S.E. 2d 884 (1953); 3 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d, Courts, Sec. 21.10. Likewise, the law of the state of the situs determines rights of claimants under a will. Johnson v. Salsbury, 232 N.C. 432, 61 S.E. 2d 327 (1950); 3 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d, Courts, Sec. 21.12.
A joint and survivorship account is created between the co-signators by contract…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ellison v. HunsingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Eger v. EgerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Vetter v. HamptonOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. SalsburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Benson v. HarmonOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- White v. ToneyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992