Legal Opinion

Norwood v. McMillan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 18, 1925No. 2549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The appellee, McMillan, filed this suit in trespass to try title against E. P. Norwood, Chas. L. Rogers and his wife, Charlotte V. Rogers. The case resolved itself into a boundary suit. The parties owned adjoining sections of land, and the location of the lines between the sections was the issue to be determined.

Appellee objects to the consideration of appllants’ brief because it fails to comply with the prescribed rules for briefing. The orief is subject to the objections urged against it, but in view of the condition of the record, it will not be necessary for us to pass upon appellee’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Dorsey v. Olive Sternenberg & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  3. W. B. Walker & Sons v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Texas Fidelity & Bonding Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. McKenzie & Ferguson v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parrish v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Williams v. FuerstenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Whaley v. LemmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Crotsenburg v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Risk v. City of ShamrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API