Legal Opinion
BEY v. WOOLRIDGE
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02237Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FREEMAN BEY, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-CV-2237 : OFFICER WOOLRIDGE, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM YOUNGE, J. JANUARY 12, 2022 This matter comes before the Court by way of a Complaint (ECF No. 2) submitted by pro se Plaintiff Freeman Bey, also known as Ronald Pondexter.1 Also before the Court is Bey’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1). Because it appears that Bey is unable to pay the filing fee, the Court will grant him leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.