Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 14, 1969No. 289-65, 303-66PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

This case arises on plaintiff’s request for review of Trial Commissioner Fletcher’s Order wherein he permitted the defendant to file amended answers in the above consolidated cases, raising two set-off claims relating to the accounting treatment for second-hand rail and welded rail.

The objection raised by plaintiff to the commissioner’s ruling is that the amendment comes too late and will permit defendant to unduly prolong the litigation and, consequently, constitutes an abuse of the trial commissioner’s discretion.

The petition in case #289-65 relating to the taxable years…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sara Lee Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Buder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Abramson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. International Fidelity Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API