Legal Opinion
Paul Rod Ramirez v. State of Arizona, Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1971No. 25978_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Ramirez appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he attacked the validity of his Arizona conviction for grand theft.
Ramirez was initially charged with robbery. After his preliminary hearing, an amended information was filed in which the robbery charge was dropped and grand theft was substituted. Ramirez, who was represented by counsel, entered a plea of guilty to the amended information. He contends that the Arizona court did not have jurisdiction to accept his plea and to sentence him, because he had not had a preliminary hearing upon the charge of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Jimmy C. Johnson v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- State v. BranhamCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
3Cited by19 opinions
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Dominick Cacoperdo v. Peter Demosthenes the Attorney General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- James Earl Hines v. J. J. Enomoto, Director, California Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- People Ex Rel. Guggenheim v. MucciNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Peterson v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.