Legal Opinion

In re Suprenant

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided October 21, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of F. Rae Suprenant, bankrupt. Motion by trustee in bankruptcy to continue an injunction granted on order to show cause restraining the sheriff and certain judgment creditors of Moody and Suprenant from selling on execution or interfering with certain personal property formerly owned by the firm or copartnership of Moody & Suprenant, but which property came into the sole possession of Suprenant as alleged owner more than four months prior to the…

Read the full summary

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of F. Rae Suprenant, bankrupt. Motion by trustee in bankruptcy to continue an injunction granted on order to show cause restraining the sheriff and certain judgment creditors of Moody and Suprenant from selling on execution or interfering with certain personal property formerly owned by the firm or copartnership of Moody & Suprenant, but which property came into the sole possession of Suprenant as alleged owner more than four months prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy against Suprenant, by the purchase thereof by Suprenant, he paying a sum in cash…

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

From about March 10, 1913, C. W. Moody and F. Rae Suprenant (Suprenant being the above-named bankrupt), *471were copartners doing business under the firm name of Moody & Suprenant. More than four months prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy by Suprenant he bought out the entire interest of Moody in the firm’s property, his sole partner in the business, and thereafter continued the business openly in his own name, having gone into sole and exclusive possession of all the firm’s property, and treating it as his own. As part of the consideration Suprenant assumed and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Fitzpatrick v. FlannaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Huiskamp v. Moline Wagon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Saunders v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aitchison Et Ux. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. In re YoungDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1915
  3. Titus v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API