(PS) Rhuma v. State of Libya
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TAHER RHUMA, et al., No. 2:20-cv-02366 JAM AC PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFFS) 14 STATE OF LIBYA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se, and the matter was accordingly referred to 18 the undersigned for pretrial proceedings by E.D. Cal. R. 302(c)(21). At the status conference on 19 October 27, 2021, all three plaintiffs were present but defendant did not appear. ECF No. 16. At 20 the hearing, the court inquired about service and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Direct Mail Specialists, Inc. v. Eclat Computerized Technologies, Inc., Dba Computerized TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Bennett v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Bennett v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.