Legal Opinion

Bussiere v. Sayman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. James E. Withrow, Judge*

1Opinion of the Court

NORTON!, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the court setting aside a final judgment by default; and the immediate question for consideration pertains to the right of appeal in such cases. The suit is on account for the reasonable value of advertising placed by defendant for plaintiff under a contract.

It appears that defendant was duly summoned more than thirty days before, to answer plaintiff’s petition on the first day of the October term, 1910, but he defaulted and came not. Thereafter, and during the October term of court, to-wit, on November 25, 1910, an interlocutory-judgment by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Judd v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Casey v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Crossland v. AdmireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Judd v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Miller v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. SaymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  2. Farrell v. DeClueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Holder v. ChidisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. State v. FinleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Jackson v. WheelerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API