Legal Opinion

Baumgardner v. American Motors Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1974No. 42985PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Here we meet for the first time the question of whether the manufacturer of an automobile involved in a collision is liable for injuries caused or enhanced because of a defect in design or manufacture, even though the defect did not cause or contribute to the collision itself. The issue has been characterized as that of the “enhanced injury” or “second accident”.

Plaintiff husband, individually and in his representative capacity for his deceased wife’s estate, sued the defendant manufacturer, American Motors Corporation, and also the owner and the driver of the car which collided with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  2. Barbara F. Evans, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roy Evans, Deceased v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Fox v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. Amend v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1977

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API