Legal Opinion
Alabama State Bar v. Simpson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 30, 1972No. SC 31PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALL, Justice.
The Grievance Committee of the Huntsville-Madison County Bar Association filed charges against the appellee, Fred B. Simpson, for violating or failing to comply with Rule 2 of Section A and Rule 36 of Section A of the Amended Rules Governing the Conduct of Attorneys in Alabama. These rules are found in 239 Ala. XXIII et seq. Rule 2 of Section A, supra, provides as follows:
“It shall be the duty of all persons heretofore or hereafter admitted to practice law in the State of Alabama:
*737“To maintain the respect due to the judicial officers and the Courts of Justice, State or Federal,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte Alabama Textile Products CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Alabama Power Co. v. City of Fort PayneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Barber Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Ex Parte DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Alabama State Bar v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gw v. Dale County Dep. of Human ResourcesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Ex Parte LockeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Alabama State Bar v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Patzka v. HooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Patzka v. HooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007