Legal Opinion

Fields v. Holland & Son

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 24, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Calloway Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle

Affirming.

This action was brought in the court below by the appellants, J. H. Fields & Son, a partnership, at the time of making the contract hereinafter mentioned composed of J. H. Fields and Lee Fields, but later succeeded by Lee Fields and Noah Moody, under the same style, *545against the appellees, E. G. Holland & Son, a partnership composed of E. G. Holland and Oscar Holland, to compel the. specific performance of a written contract the latter made with appellants in 1909, and restrain them by injunction from operating a competing omnibus line in further…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Calor Oil & Gas Co. v. FranzellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Anderson v. JettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  4. Hancock v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Clemons v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gross, Kelly & Co. v. BiboNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Gess v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Vanover v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Mounts v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Senters v. Ratliff's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API