Legal Opinion
Honolulu Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee of United Ass'n Local Union No. 675 v. Foster
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 19, 2001No. CIV. 00-00496BMKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KURREN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is an action to recover the cost of training Defendant James H. Foster, III (“Defendant”) in the apprenticeship training program administered by Plaintiff Honolulu Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of United Association Local Union No. 675 (“Plaintiff’). Cross-motions for Summary Judgment came on for hearing before this court on March 2, 2001. Fred I. Waki, Esq., appeared on behalf of Plaintiff; Kelly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hummell v. S. E. Rykoff & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- S.A. McElwaine an Unmarried Person, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Us West, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lundstrom v. YoungDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Trustees of Plumbers v. RossmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020