Legal Opinion

Arbo Corp. v. Aidan Marketing/Distribution, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1986No. Civ. 4-85-692PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Arbo Corporation (Arbo), a Washington corporation, brought this diversity action against Aidan Marketing/Distribution, Inc. in its own name and d/b/a Aidan Distribution, Inc. (hereinafter Aidan), and Millie Engborg, individually and d/b/a Aidan Distribution, Inc. Arbo seeks to recover for goods sold and delivered to Aidan. The parties have settled all of the issues in this case except one: Whether or not Mille Engborg is liable individually for any portion of Arbo’s claim. Waiving their right to a jury trial on this issue, they submit the question to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Timberline Equipment Company, Inc. v. DavenportOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Richards v. Minnesota Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. John L. Whiting & Sons Co. v. BartonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. State v. RiversSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API