Saper v. Rodgers
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile-truck collision. After a trial to a jury the trial court, on the motion of the defendant, entered a judgment non obstante veredicto disregarding the answers of the jury finding that one of the plaintiffs failed to keep a proper lookout to the rear, and entered a judgment for the plaintiffs on the remaining findings of the jury. The plaintiffs are appellants.
Appellants predicated their appeal on the proposition that the trial court erred in sustaining the appellees’ motion to disregard the defensive…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Northeast Texas Motor Lines, Inc. v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- London Terrace, Inc. v. McAlisterTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Panos v. Foley Bros. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1946
- Whitehead v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gonzales v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Texas Power & Light Co. v. BarnhillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Bayoud v. North Central Investment Corp. Ex Rel. Bayoud, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Colom v. VititowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.