Legal Opinion
People v. Doe
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J. Sedita, J.
This matter was brought on by an order to show cause why a Grand Jury subpoena duces tecum should not be quashed. Said subpoena was issued by the District Attorney, pursuant to the Grand Jury’s subpoena powers, to the Chief Clerk of Supreme Court, Erie County, seeking the production of portions of the court’s files on a matrimonial action. Access to the requested documents was denied by the clerk.
The basis for the refusal to produce the requested documents was section 235 of the Domestic Relations Law which prohibits (subd 1) “any examination or perusal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gwynne v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- East End Trust Co. v. OttenNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- MATTER OF BUSH v. SalernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Erie County Water Authority v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- In re Grand Jury SubpoenasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rubino v. Albany Medical Center HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. MalatyNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. OkerekeNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Forest Hills Gardens Corp. v. KampCivil Court of the City of New York · 1995
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports2002