Legal Opinion
O'Neil v. O'Neil
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 2, 1924No. 4042PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Acting Associate Justice.
In this .case Catherine E. O’Neil sued her husband, James E. O’Neil, for an absolute divorce, with alimony, upon the ground of adultery, naming Rachel E. De Meza and May R. Proctor,as corespondents. There was no living issue of the marriage. The plaintiff prayed also for an accounting as to certain building association deposits and other assets which she alleged were held by her husband in trust for her. The husband answered, denying the charge of adultery, and that he held any assets in trust for the plaintiff. He prayed for a limited divorce from plaintiff…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lamson v. BoydenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Underwood v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
- Southern Railway News Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States of America and O. Gordon Delk, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Richard Goodman, Also Known as Kick GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Moore v. BackusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- O'Neil v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Prep v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1962
- United States of America and O. Gordon Delk, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Richard Goodman, Also Known as Kick GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961